Browsing: Glitch
The resulting pathogens, known as bacteriophages – viruses that infect bacteria – cannot infect humans or animals, the report stated. Samuel King, a Stanford graduate student and study author, told the New York Times (NYT): “It just felt like the obvious next step.” Large language models, which underlie tools such as ChatGPT, can generate realistic text and pose risks of misuse in creating fake news or other misinformation [1].
Evo Model Trained on Genetic Sequences
Evo, a program similar to ChatGPT, scanned about nine trillion nucleotide bases from animals, plants, viruses and microbes, according to the research team. Rather than analyzing written text, the model was used to dissect and form genetic code, the report stated.
After learning natural DNA patterns, Evo generated nearly 300 genomes of Phi X-174, a virus chosen because it cannot infect humans or animals. Sixteen of those genomes were determined to be viable, the study reported.
In petri dish tests, some AI-designed phages multiplied faster than the original Phi X-174 and burst out of host cells, according to the authors. The researchers selected Phi X-174 because a virus genome is less complex than the DNA instructions found in a human cell, the report stated.
Researchers Call Study a Turning Point
Marc Güell of Pompeu Fabra University in Spain told the BBC the study was “a very significant turning point” and “allows us to dream of exciting possibilities for tackling humanity’s greatest challenges.” Güell said that “for the first time in history, we are beginning to design biology on a computer,” according to the BBC.
The scientists said they did not provide the model with data from viruses that infect humans, animals, plants or fungi, the article noted. The team also excluded similar viruses that infect other organisms, the report stated.
Biosafety and Biosecurity Questions Raised
But Dr. Thomas Inglesby and Dr. Moritz Hanke of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security wrote in a Science article that the results raised “urgent biosafety and biosecurity questions.” They said the issue is no longer “whether generative viral genome design will exist” but whether it can be used without “enabling serious harm.” Viruses that could cause disease “should not be pursued,” they added, according to the report.
Hanke told NYT: “You could say, ‘Hey, genomic language model, make me an influenza genome that is modified to be more transmissible or to be more lethal.'” A Microsoft study demonstrated that AI can be used to design novel, toxic biological agents by “paraphrasing” the genetic sequences of known toxins, allowing them to bypass commercial biosecurity screening software, according to a NaturalNews.com report [2].
The U.S. National Institutes of Health should improve how it regulates lab-generated viruses that could pose a national security risk, according to its biosecurity advisers, the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity [3]. In a previous case, a team at Boston University’s National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories developed a new strain of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) that killed 80% of infected mice in a laboratory setting, according to a preprint study [4]. Declassified documents released in June 2026 showed U.S.-funded coronavirus research included planning for spike-protein modifications, receptor-adaptation experiments, and testing in humanized mice, according to ZeroHedge [5].
Implications of AI-Designed Pathogens
The study is among the first examples of generative AI being applied to biology, according to researchers, and the field remains at an early stage. Scientists emphasized that the resulting bacteriophages pose no threat to humans, but the methods could be adapted to other genomes, experts said.
Some analysts have said that only a few companies in the world have the resources to invest in developing large language models similar to GPT-4, a factor that could shape oversight [1]. The report raised policy questions about future oversight of AI-generated biological sequences, with the authors stating that dangerous viruses should not be pursued. A technology executive described one path as “to completely prioritize technology to maximize what’s possible without considering potential implications.” [1]
References
- aacid zlib3 files 20241105T001425Z 29870425 3zFrZWC8qLJzJ5FoyS9nN5.
- Ava Grace. “Digital Pandora’s Box: How AI Outsmarts Biosecurity and Paves the Path for Next-Generation Threats”. NaturalNews.com. October 09, 2025.
- Emily Kopp. “‘Vague and Secretive’: Risky NIH Research Not Adequately Regulated, Experts Say”. Children’s Health Defense. January 21, 2024.
- Michael Nevradakis. “Insane: Boston Researchers Create ‘More Lethal’ Strain of COVID, Prompting Calls to Shut Down Risky Gain-of-Function Research”. Children’s Health Defense. January 21, 2024.
- “Gabbard Drops Fauci COVID-19 Receipts On Last Day: He Funded The Research, Cooked The Cover Story, Then Lied To Congress”. Zero Hedge. June 19, 2026.
Explainer Infographic

AI model artificial intelligence bacteriophages badhealth badscience biological weapons biosafety biosecurity bioterrorism biowar computing Dangerous DNA patterns Evo future tech genetic lunacy Glitch information technology nucleotides pathogens Phi X-174 robots virus genome Viruses
Please contact us for more information.
Who We Are
Meet the Health Ranger
Free Email Newsletter
Support
Write for Us
Media Information
Advertising Information
Submit a News Tip
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Home
All News
Health Ranger Store
Health Ranger Report Podcast
Natural News App
BrightAnswers.ai
Blog Articles
RSS Feed
This site is part of the Natural News Network © 2022 All Rights Reserved. Privacy | Terms All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing International, LTD. is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.
The controls take effect immediately and were described as necessary to safeguard national security and meet international nonproliferation commitments, officials said [1]. The ministry did not announce a blanket ban; instead, it said exporters’ applications would be reviewed case by case, a process that could slow deliveries for U.S. buyers of drone technology [2]. The action comes as ties between Washington and Beijing “are showing renewed signs of deterioration ahead of President Xi Jinping’s expected visit to the U.S. in late September,” according to a report by ZeroHedge [2].
Details of the Countermeasures
In the same statement, Beijing barred Chinese organizations and individuals from dealing with seven U.S. entities, the ministry said [1]. Six of the entities were listed over support for U.S. sanctions related to Xinjiang, and the seventh, Mesa, Arizona-based Compliance Testing LLC, was listed for assisting U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) measures that China said endanger its sovereignty and security, according to the announcement. The orders did not specify asset freezes or travel bans, officials said.
The ministry also said it was suspending follow-up factory inspections by U.S. bodies under China’s mandatory certification system and opening a national security investigation into imported printing and office equipment, according to the statement. Chinese officials described the measures as countermeasures to U.S. actions and said they were necessary to protect Chinese interests.
U.S. Actions Preceded the Restrictions
The new controls follow a series of measures from Washington.. On July 23, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer announced tariffs of up to 12.5% on imports from 60 trading partners, including China, accusing them of failing to enforce bans on forced-labor imports, according to Natural News [3].
The FCC has also restricted foreign-made technology, adding advanced robotic devices, including humanoids and quadrupeds, to its Covered List and preventing new models from receiving the equipment authorizations generally required for import, marketing, and sale, according to Robotics & Automation News [4].
China said the U.S. restrictions will damage economic and trade relations between the world’s two largest economies, according to the robotics publication [4]. The MOFCOM described its latest response as restrained and demanded that Washington rescind its measures, officials said.
Escalating Cycle of Trade Responses
The Aug. 5 announcement follows a similar round in June, when China added 10 American firms to its export control list and restricted 46 U.S. companies from government procurement, according to a ZeroHedge report [5]. The June move came after the U.S. Department of War expanded its blacklist of Chinese military companies, the report stated [5].
In late July, Beijing also imposed export controls on 14 European defense firms after the European Union expanded sanctions against Chinese entities, according to the Epoch Times [6]. The broader pattern is not without precedent.
A historical account of U.S. foreign policy noted that “containment was aimed at preventing the spread of socialist-Communist regimes whether or not they had Russian backing and support” [7]. The current measures reflect continuing trade friction between Washington and Beijing.
Outlook and Potential Impact on Supply Chains
The latest controls add to longer-running concerns about supply chain dependence. Nazak Nikakhtar, a former U.S. Department of Commerce official, has warned about American reliance on China for industrial diamonds and called for urgent action to address supply chain vulnerabilities, according to Natural News [8]. Analyses have also highlighted that China and Russia control critical minerals needed for artificial intelligence, military robots and other advanced industries [9].
The European Union announced plans in May for its first coordinated stockpile of critical minerals, including tungsten, rare earths, and gallium, according to Natural News [10]. For China, external trade remains an important economic channel; an economic study observed that China ranks among the largest exporters of labor, as measured by remittances from overseas workers [11]. Beijing has said further U.S. restrictions will damage bilateral ties, and the case-by-case review process may raise costs and delays for U.S. purchasers of Chinese drone technology [4][2].
References
- The Epoch Times. “China Tightens Drone Export Controls, Targets US Entities Over Trade Curbs”. August 5, 2026.
- ZeroHedge. “Tit-For-Tat: China Hits Back At US With Tighter Drone Export Controls”. August 5, 2026.
- NaturalNews.com. “Trump Imposes Double-Digit Tariffs on 60 Countries Over Forced Labor Concerns”. July 26, 2026.
- Robotics & Automation News. “China threatens retaliation after US restricts imports of new foreign-made humanoid robots”. August 4, 2026.
- ZeroHedge. “China Sanctions 10 US Defense, Rare Earth Firms, Restricts 46 From Govt Procurement Weeks After Pentagon Blacklist”. June 22, 2026.
- The Epoch Times. “Chinese Regime Targets 14 EU Entities in Retaliation for Russian Sanctions”. July 24, 2026.
- Carey McWilliams. “The education of Carey McWilliams”.
- Belle Carter. “An urgent call to tackle U.S. dependence on China’s industrial diamonds”. NaturalNews.com. February 2, 2025.
- Mike Adams. “ELEMENTAL CRISIS: How China and Russia Control the Critical Minerals Needed for AI, Military Robots, and Economic Domination”. NaturalNews.com. May 1, 2025.
- NaturalNews.com. “EU and U.S. launch strategic stockpile to break China’s rare earth stranglehold”. May 25, 2026.
- Amar Bhide. “The venturesome economy: how innovation sustains prosperity in a more connected world”.
Explainer Infographic

big government Bubble chaos China Chinese Communist Party Collapse communist China countermeasures dollar demise drone components drone technology drone watch news economic sanctions export controls Glitch market crash military tech Ministry of Commerce national security risk robotics robots supply chain warning trade war United States weapons technology
Please contact us for more information.






















