Browsing: traitors

I have spent years as part of the MAGA coalition, and I can tell you plainly: the rug has been pulled. In my interview with Owen Shroyer, aired as fuel emergencies were being declared across seven states and Trump was poised for yet more war, the core warning was unmistakable — MAGA loyalty has collapsed because Trump abandoned the anti-war promises that put him in power ^[1]. That is not a footnote to the story; it is the story.

The anti-war vote is the decisive swing bloc in modern presidential elections, and Trump’s march to war with Iran has forfeited it.

I voted for Donald Trump twice. Now the Republican Party has failed as a vehicle for peace and liberty. A third-party or independent path to 2028 is not a luxury; it is the only honest road left, and the energy that once flowed into MAGA will now likely flow into an independent party movement.

MAGA Loyalty Was a Means, Not a Master

Owen Shroyer was a top MAGA influencer well before 2016, and he reminds us of something the obedience cult would rather forget: many of us were political activists before Trump even hit the stage. And we will still be here when Trump is long gone. True principles should never depend on who occupies the White House; the movement existed before Trump and will continue after him ^[2]. What we are watching now is supporters trapped in a political silo, confusing loyalty to a man with loyalty to principles — no new wars, fiscal conservatism, border enforcement, and deep-state accountability.

The MAGA movement was supposed to be a tool for saving the country, not an obedience cult that demands silence when its leader sells out. The coalition has become a protection racket for power rather than a movement based on principle.

When people like Owen and myself are branded traitors for refusing to cheer war and censorship, it proves the movement has inverted its own values. This is the pattern I have now seen on both the left and the right: a cyclical, cult-like obedience in which both sides swap which authority figure they worship while the script stays the same ^[3]. A movement that punishes its most principled members for telling the truth is no longer a movement. It is a personality cult with an email list.

The Anti-War Vote Is the Real Swing Bloc

Owen argues, and I agree, that the anti-war vote has decided every real presidential election since 2008. Obama rode it. Trump rode it in 2016, and he rode it again in 2024. The 2020 election, by contrast, was a con job — a coalition assembled on fear and rigged ballots, not on a genuine mandate for peace. The lesson is simple: whoever wins the anti-war bloc wins the White House.

Trump’s second term abandoned the “no new wars” cornerstone, and the price is now being paid at the pump. Endless war is an engine of corruption and control: the republic will not be conquered by an external enemy, but hollowed out from within by war without end ^[4]. That engine runs on the stolen purchasing power of working people.

The Republicans are likely to lose the midterms and the White House in 2028 unless Trump reverses course immediately. The recent farmer bailout and the gimmick giveaways are not solutions; they are proof that the GOP has turned to money printing and desperation ^[5]. Bribing voters with their own devalued dollars is what dying parties do. When a party cannot keep its promises, it starts buying its way out of the consequences.

Censorship and the Obedience Cult

We endured more censorship under Trump’s first term than under Biden, and the pattern is repeating. Meanwhile, X is no longer a free-speech platform but an AI data-gathering operation, and the same censorship apparatus is being rebuilt under new management. This is not a left-versus-right issue; it is a centralized-power issue.

If Democrats win Congress, they will persecute Trump loyalists — and they now know exactly where to look: Guilfoyle, Grinnell, Haba, Hegseth, the missing money, the insider trading, and the war crimes. The people who built the surveillance state always leave a trail, and the other team is happy to follow it. The Uniparty does not lose when one of its mascots falls; it simply prosecutes the opposition while excusing its own crimes of corruption.

What the two-party duopoly offers is a rotating cycle of persecution in which the same corrupt institutions survive every election. The lesson for 2028 is not to pick a better master. It is to stop kneeling.

The Third-Party Opening

The two-party system is brittle, and an independent presidential candidate could win Texas and throw the 270-electoral-vote board into chaos. That is not a fantasy; it is arithmetic. When both parties have betrayed their bases on war and censorship, the center of gravity moves to the exits. Elon Musk’s America Party originally registered as a real competitor to Republicans and Democrats, proof that the duopoly’s grip is cracking ^[6]. The opening is real, but it will close if it is filled with opportunists instead of principles.

Matthew McConaughey is not my ideological soulmate, but he illustrates the opening: a popular independent from Texas could break the duopoly and force a real debate on war, speech, and money. The point is not the man; it is the mechanism. A serious independent candidacy, built on anti-war and anti-censorship commitments, can do what decades of party reform have failed to do — make the Uniparty answer for its record.

A winning coalition will require sacrifices from left and right, including trading the war machine’s budget for domestic priorities and resisting foreign-interest gatekeeping in both parties. The MAGA movement is fracturing precisely because America-first conservatives are being targeted for putting U.S. sovereignty ahead of foreign interests ^[7]. Younger Americans face unaffordable housing, scarce capital, and a rigged economy, and neither party addresses the underlying cause: endless war and money printing. War is inflation. Money printing is war on savings. The two are essentially the same policy wearing different uniforms.

Conclusion: Principle Over Party

MAGA loyalists will soon have to explain why they tolerated treason, war, and censorship simply because Trump was the one doing it. The coalition that marched on Washington and cheered “America First” is now being asked to cheer for war with Iran and for the surveillance state that polices its own voters. That bill comes due soon — and the honest among us will not pay it.

Trump’s GOP was the last available vehicle for saving the country, and it has failed. The energy that once went into MAGA must now go into an anti-war, anti-censorship independent movement. The movement was always bigger than one man. The principles were always bigger than one party. The task now falls upon us to prove it.

I believe the path forward is to support candidates who oppose foreign wars, defend free speech, resist Zionist infiltration and reject the Uniparty — regardless of party label. Principle over party is not a slogan; it is the only survival strategy left for a republic that has been hollowed out by its own leaders.

Find more truth at NaturalNews.com and BrightVideos.com, and put your faith in principles that no politician can revoke.

References

1. Bright Videos News, Oct 22, 2026 – Fuel Emergencies Declared Across America as Trump Poised for MORE WAR + Interview with Owen Shroyer on the COLLAPSE of Political Party Loyalty. 2026-10-22T16:03:07.581Z.
2. Political Principles and Staying True to Your Values, an interview with Owen Shroyer. 2026-10-22T20:01:41.991Z.
3. The American Minds Bipartisan Brainwashing Cycle – NaturalNews.com, March 05, 2026. by NaturalNews.com
4. Tucker Carlson Exposes How Endless War Is An Engine of Corruption and Control on “Decentralize TV” – NaturalNews.com, July 15, 2026. by NaturalNews.com
5. The Implosion of MAGA How Trumps March to War Exposes a Movements Betrayal – NaturalNews.com, February 26, 2026. by NaturalNews.com
6. Elon Musk officially launches a political party The America Party to compete with Republicans and Democrats – NaturalNews.com, July 07, 2025. by NaturalNews.com
7. MAGA divided: Zionist influence sparks GOP backlash over Israel First politics – NaturalNews.com, December 02, 2025. by NaturalNews.com

Explainer Infographic

Accountability reaches a crossroads

A convergence of legal challenges and media revelations has placed former National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Anthony Fauci at the center of an intensifying accountability movement, as Republican lawmakers pursue contempt proceedings, perjury investigations, and revelations emerge about alleged censorship of pandemic-related reporting.

The developments mark a significant shift in the public reckoning over COVID-19 policy decisions that resulted in prolonged school closures, business shutdowns and unprecedented government mandates affecting millions of Americans.

Senate subpoena refusal escalates tensions

On Friday, Fauci declined a voluntary request to appear before Sen. Ron Johnson’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, marking the second Senate panel seeking his testimony. The Wisconsin Republican has conducted a parallel investigation into the federal pandemic response, including vaccine safety and efficacy questions.

Johnson’s office confirmed receiving notification from Fauci’s attorney rejecting the interview request. The senator stated that his subcommittee would continue obtaining records and speaking with former associates of the longtime public health official while exploring legal options.

This refusal follows the Senate Homeland Security Committee’s party-line vote to hold Fauci in contempt after his July 29 appearance, during which he asserted Fifth Amendment protections more than 100 times rather than answer substantive questions.

Media censorship allegations surface

In a separate development, former ABC News senior national correspondent Terry Moran revealed that his network gutted a 2021 Nightline investigation into the Wuhan lab-leak theory after Fauci reviewed the script. Speaking on The Fifth Column podcast, Moran described receiving the edited piece with instructions that Fauci had seen it.

Moran stated that the final product arrived “incomprehensible,” stripped of meaningful analysis and loaded with caveats. The former correspondent said he never watched the broadcast again because it no longer represented his work.

The account provides a rare insider perspective on how mainstream media outlets handled lab-origin questions during the pandemic, when such inquiries were frequently dismissed as fringe conspiracy theories.

Legal arguments over Fifth Amendment protections

Sen. Rand Paul, the Kentucky Republican chairing the Homeland Security Committee, has argued that former President Joe Biden’s preemptive pardon of Fauci eliminates any legitimate basis for invoking Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination.

Legal experts have noted the complexity of the pardon question. While a federal pardon removes criminal jeopardy for covered offenses, it does not necessarily protect against state prosecutions or civil litigation. State attorneys general in Florida, Alabama and Louisiana have opened separate investigations.

Paul has also renewed calls for the Justice Department to examine whether Fauci committed perjury during his 2021 congressional testimony about gain-of-function research funding. Fauci testified that NIH did not fund such research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a statement Paul contends was false.

Historical context and ongoing investigations

The current pressure on Fauci follows years of scrutiny over pandemic policies and research funding decisions. Documents obtained through congressional investigations revealed private communications where Fauci discussed potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccines that were not publicly disclosed at the time.

Emails released by Paul’s office showed Fauci instructing then-NIH Director Francis Collins to “read it, then destroy it” regarding certain records — language that Paul characterized as a potential violation of federal records law.

The House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic previously conducted its own investigation, producing a final report that challenged several of Fauci’s public statements regarding lab-leak origins and research funding.

A reckoning long deferred

The accumulation of legal challenges, media revelations and congressional actions suggests that the era of unquestioning deference to public health authorities has ended. Johnson’s subcommittee continues pursuing records and witness testimony, while the contempt referral awaits action at the Justice Department.

Whether these efforts produce criminal charges, civil liability, or simply a fuller public accounting remains uncertain. What appears increasingly clear is that the American people’s demand for answers about the COVID-19 response will not be satisfied by silence, privilege claims, or media gatekeeping.

The investigations into Fauci’s conduct represent more than a political conflict. They raise fundamental questions about government transparency, scientific integrity and the accountability of unelected officials whose decisions carried profound consequences for individual liberty and public health.

Sources for this article include:

Modernity.com

FoxNews.com

RSC-pluger.house.gov